A hybrid Multi-Response Optimization for the Best Biofuel Blend Selection using AHP–TOPSIS Methods

  • Aparna V. Kulkarni Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), College of Engineering, Pune
  • Dyaneshwar G. Kumbhar Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), College of Engineering, Pune
  • Kailasnath B. Sutar Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), College of Engineering, Pune
  • Kailasnath B. Sutar Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), College of Engineering, Pune
Keywords: MCDM, AHP, TOPSIS, Best blend

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate biofuel blend is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) dilemma based on various qualitative and inconsistent criteria, which are crucial for determining the feasibility of new energy sources. This paper presents a hybrid methodology using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to compute the relative criteria weights, whereas the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was used to rank the available alternatives. The results indicated that brake thermal efficiency (BTE) and nitric oxides (NOx) are the two most important criteria for rating the performance of a biofuel blend. The following preferences were attained for the blends by using the hybrid AHP–TOPSIS method: BD20CeO200 > BD100CeO200 > D > BD20 > BD100. Hence, after using the hybrid MCDM methods for various biofuel blends, the BD20 with Cerium oxide nanoparticles (200 ppm) was selected as the best biofuel blend for operating CI engines.

References

[1] TyagiM, Kumar P, Kumar D. A hybrid approach using AHP-TOPSIS for analyzing e-SCM performance. Procedia Eng (2014),97,195–203.
[2] Berdie AD, Osaci M, Muscalagiu I, BarzC. A combined approach of AHP and TOPSIS methods applied in the field of integrated software systems. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017.
[3] Sakthivel G, Ilangkumaran M, Gaikwad A. A hybrid multi-criteria decision modeling approach for the best biodiesel blend selection based on ANP-TOPSIS analysis. Ain Shams Eng J 2015.
[4] Sakthivel G, Sivakumar R., Ilangkumaran M, Ikua BW. Selection of optimum Fish oil fuel blend to reduce the greenhouse gases emissions in an IC engine—a hybrid multiple criteria decision aid approach. Int J Green Energy 2016.
[5] Mukherjee K. Analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution: a bibliometric analysis 'from' past, present and future of AHP and TOPSIS. Int JIntell Eng Inform 2014;2.
[6] Tzeng G-H, Lin C-W, Opricovic S.Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy2005;33:1373–83.
[7] Sakthivel G, Nagarajan G, Ilangkumaran M, Kumar SS, Suresh KS. A hybrid multi-criteria decision support system for selection of optimum fuel blend. Int JExergy 2013;12:463–90.
[8] Chen L, Ren J. Multi-attribute sustainability evaluation of alternative aviation fuels based on fuzzy ANP and fuzzy grey relational analysis. J Air Transp Manage 2018;68:176–86.
[9] Wu CS, Lin CT, Lee C. Optimal marketing strategy: a decision making with ANP and TOPSIS. Int J Prod Econ 2010;127(1):190–6.
[10] Choudhary, D. and Shankar, R., 2012. An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India. Energy, 42(1), pp.510-521.
[11] Prakash, C. and Barua, M.K., 2015. Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, pp.599-615.
[12] Patil, S.K. and Kant, R., 2014. A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of Knowledge Management adoption in Supply Chain to overcome its barriers. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(2), pp.679-693.
[13] Pitchipoo, P. Venkumar, P. and Rajakarunakaran, S., 2013. Modeling and development of a decision support system for supplier selection in the process industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 9, 23.
[14] Mu Rui and Zhang Jiatai., 2007. Research of hierarchy synthetic evaluation based on grey relational analysis. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services.
[15] Ghorabaee, M.K.; Amiri, M.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Antucheviciene, J. Supplier evaluation and selection in fuzzy environments: A review of 0$'0DSSURDFKHV(FRQ5HV(NRQ,VWUDåLYDQMD– 1118.
[16] Amit R. Patil, S.A. Patil, Rupali Patil, A.M. Pawar, V.N. Chougule, Kareem AboRas, Validation of effect of composite additive on optimized combustion characteristics of CI engine using AHP and GRA method. Heliyon, 10, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34216
[17] A.R. Patil, D. Kakati, B. Singh, M.A. Rosen, R. Patil, V. Javanjal, C. Sonawane, H. Panchal, A.Kumar, M.I.H. Siddiqui, K.K. Sadasivuni, Experimental investigation of multiadditive fuel blend and its optimization for CI engine performance and emissions by the hybrid Taguchi technique, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
(2023),doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103703.
[18] Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988.
[19] Chyu C-C, Fang Y-C. A hybrid fuzzy analytic network process approach to the new product development selection problem. Math Problems Eng. (2014).
[20] Avikal S, Jain R, Mishra P. A Kano model, AHP and M-TOPSIS method based technique for disassembly line balancing under fuzzy environment. Appl. Soft Comput. (2014), 25, 519–529.
Published
2025-12-10
How to Cite
Kulkarni, A., Kumbhar, D., Sutar, K., & Sutar, K. (2025). A hybrid Multi-Response Optimization for the Best Biofuel Blend Selection using AHP–TOPSIS Methods. Asian Journal For Convergence In Technology (AJCT) ISSN -2350-1146, 11(2), 43-48. Retrieved from http://www.asianssr.org/index.php/ajct/article/view/1416

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.