Performance Analysis and Comparison of Complex LMS, Sign LMS and RLS Algorithms for Speech Enhancement Application

  • Mrinal Rahul Bachute university of pune
  • Dr.R D Kharadkar
Keywords: speech enhancement, adaptive filter, least mean square algoritham amd recursive least mean square algorithm

Abstract

Recent developments in the area of adaptive signal processing have advanced massively due to increase in powerful and cost effective digital signal processors with low cost memory chips. The uses of speech processing system for voice communication and recognition task have become more and more common. These factors lead to promote the use of digital signal processing technology for implementation of emerging applications. The process to remove unwanted interference is common and occurs in many situations. The technique of adaptive filtering is a method by which signal enhancement or noise reduction can be accomplished. An adaptive filter self adjusts its transfer function according to an optimizing algorithm. In this paper we carried out the analysis and experimentation to study the existing adaptive filter algorithms and their application for speech enhancement. The paper describes Least Mean Square (LMS) algorithm and Recursive Least Square (RLS). The complex Least Mean Square (CLMS) algorithm and the modification in CLMS lead to Sign Least Mean Square (SLMS) algorithm. The Sign-Sign Least Mean Square algorithm (SSLMS) is also considered for comparison. Normalization operation is performed on the sample which leads to evolution of NLMS algorithm. The experimentation revels that LMS have fast convergence than RLS. The computational complexity of RLS is very high as compared to LMS.

References

Jie, Yang, and Wang Zhenli. "On the application of variable-step adaptive noise cancelling for improving the robustness of speech recognition." In Computing, Communication, Control, and Management, 2009. CCCM 2009. ISECS International Colloquium on, vol. 2, pp. 419422. IEEE, 2009.
[2]. Pandey, Alkon, L. D. Malviya, and Vineet Sharma. "Comparative study of LMS and NLMS algorithms in adaptive equalizer." International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) 2, no. 3 (2012): 15841587.
[3]. Douglas, Scott C., and Weimin Pan. "Exact expectation analysis of the LMS adaptive filter." Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on 43, no. 12 (1995): 2863-2871.
[4]. Chu, Hyung Suk, and Chong Koo An. "Design of the adaptive noise canceler using neural network with backpropagation algorithm." In Science and Technology, 1999. KORUS'99. Proceedings. The Third RussianKorean International Symposium on, vol. 2, pp. 762-764. IEEE, 1999.
[5]. Yi Hu, Philipos C. Loizou,” Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms”, Speech Communication ELSEVIER Journal,SPCOM Science Direct,pp-588 – 601, 2006 6]. Caraiscos, Liu, “A round of error analysis of LMS Adaptive algorithm” , IEEE transaction on Acoustics Speech & Signal Processing, January 2000 .
[7]. Gardner W. “Learning characteristics of scholastic gradient descent algorithms : A general study analysis & critique ”, IEEE Signal Processing Volume 6, PP 113133, April 2010
[8]. Kailath, “Lectures on Wiener and Kalman filtering”, Springer link 2001, New York [8] Scott C. Douglas, ZEEE and Weimin Pan” Exact Expectation Analysis of the LMS Adaptive Filter’. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 43, no. 12, Dec 2001.
[9]. Adaptive Filter Pitch Extraction patented to the inventors named Rajeev Nongpiur, Burnaby (CA) Phillip A. Hetherington, Port Moody (CA) dated on April 3 2012
[10]. Rong Hu and Yunxin Zhao recommended by D. Wang published a Research Article 12 May 2008
[11]. Marvin R. Sambur, “Lms Adaptive Filtering For Enhancing The Quality Of Noisy Speech” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing CH1285—6/78/0000—0610$O07.5 @19781EEE.
[12]. Lau, Yuu-Seng, Zahir M. Hussian, and Richard Harris. "A time-dependent LMS algorithm for adaptive filtering." WSEAS Transactions on Circuits and Systems3.1 (2004): 35-42.
[13]. Kwong, Raymond H., and Edward W. Johnston. "A variable step size LMS algorithm." Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on 40.7 (1992): 1633-1642.
[14]. Fast Affine Projection Algorithm done by Steven L. Gay and Sanjeev Tavathia at the Acoustics Research Department AT&T Bell Laboratories
[15]. Subjective comparison and evaluation of Speech Enhancement Algorithms done by Yi Hu, Philipos C. Loizou Department of Electrical Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, USA published research paper in Elsevier Publication Speech Communication on 18 December 2006.
[16]. Philipos C. Loizou, Senior Member IEEE and Gibak Kim published research work r in IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, Vol. 19, No.1, January 2011
[17]. Christian Feldbauer, Franz Pernkopf, and Erhard Rank Signal Processing and Speech Communication Laboratory Tutorial on Adaptive Filters. http://www.dsprelated.com
[18]. S.C. Douglas. “Exact Expectation Analysis without the independence assumption of the LMS Adaptive Filter” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 43, no. 12, Dec 2000.
[19]. F. Yang, M. Wu, P. Ji, and J. Yang, “An Improved Multiband-Structured Subband Adaptive Filter Algorithm,” vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 647–650, 2012.
[20]. S. Sami and P. Padmaja, “Speech Enhancement Using Fast Adaptive Kalman Filtering Algorithm Along With Weighting Filter,” vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 387–390, 2013.
Published
2018-03-20
How to Cite
Bachute, M., & Kharadkar, D. (2018). Performance Analysis and Comparison of Complex LMS, Sign LMS and RLS Algorithms for Speech Enhancement Application. Asian Journal For Convergence In Technology (AJCT) ISSN -2350-1146, 3(3). Retrieved from http://www.asianssr.org/index.php/ajct/article/view/222
Section
Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.